Personal tools
You are here: Home Academics Syllabi Fall 2005 Syllabi MIS 44285 F05 Franquesa
Navigation
 

MIS 44285 F05 Franquesa

M&IS 44285: INTEGRATED BUSINESS POLICY / STRATEGY

College of Business

Kent State University

Fall 2005

 

Section 001 Call #13960 Classroom 210 BSA T/Th 10:45 am - noon

Section 002 Call #13961 Classroom 210 BSA T/Th 10:45 am – noon (Honors section)

Section 004 Call #13963 Classroom 108 BSA T/Th 9:15 – 10:30 am

 

PROFESSOR:   Dr. Jaume Franquesa

Office:                 BSA 407

Telephone:           67-21161

E-mail address:    T.B.A.

Office hours:      T/Th. 1:00 – 3:30 p.m.

 

 

COURSE PREREQUISITES

M&IS 24163, and permission.

Students who do not have the proper prerequisite risk being deregistered from the class.

 

 

READING MATERIALS:

Required:        1.- Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization –Concepts, 6th edition, 2005, Michael A. Hitt, R. Duane Ireland, & Robert E. Hoskisson.

 

2.- Course pack with cases.

 

Optional:         A general business magazine or newspaper such as Business Week, Fortune,

or The Wall Street Journal is recommended.  Selected materials from these sources may be assigned from time to time.

 

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

            The aim of this course is to improve your ability to understand how organizations choose to compete in a given marketplace, why some succeed and others fail, and what can be done to improve a firm’s competitive position.  In short, this course is about business success and failure.  Our objective is to identify the sources of competitive advantage and disadvantage of individual business firms, in their respective marketplaces, and to devise ways in which they could enhance their strategic positioning.  We will also explore sources of long-term shareholder value created by large diversified corporations.

 

            The course takes the perspective of a practitioner general manager.  Two main implications derive from this.  First, this course is not only about concepts, but also about applying those concepts to real-life business situations.  Second, the emphasis of the course is on making the total organization successful, rather than concentrating into any single business function.  As such, the course is designed to build upon previous work in the business program, providing a "total business" perspective.  You will be able to integrate, and build upon material you have learned previously in your economics, finance, marketing and organizational behavior classes.

 

LEARNING OBJECTIVES:

This course provides students with the opportunity to:

(1)   Learn about a number of strategic management concepts, principles, and analytical tools.  The list of topics that will be covered is presented in pages 9 to17 below.

 

(2)   Apply these concepts, principles, and tools to real-life business cases.

 

(3)   Develop your analytical skills and practice your ability to think as managers.

 

(4)   Develop and practice the ability to structure, present, and sustain arguments in front of your colleagues, as well as the ability to listen and react to the arguments of others.

 

 

CLASS FORMAT:

The course is a broad survey of several topics of interest.  For each topic you are assigned one book chapter and a case to prepare.  Book chapters introduce concepts, principles, and managerial tools related to the week’s topic.  Cases provide a real-life business situation that will be used to apply the concepts and tools learned for each topic.  We will meet during class periods to discuss these materials.  Accordingly, class time will be evenly split between theory sessions and case analysis sessions.

During our theory sessions, I will review and extend what you have read in the assigned book chapters.  Beyond reinforcing main ideas, these sessions are designed to provide an opportunity for you to clarify misconceptions and to ask further questions on the topic. 

During case analysis sessions, the focus will be on diagnosing what is critical in a complex business situation and on finding realistic solutions to the strategic and/or organizational problems at hand.  We intend to benefit from group thinking and to learn from each other during these sessions.  I will take on a discussion facilitator role, expecting students to introduce their own ideas and points of view, and to draw, challenge, and build upon ideas expressed by others.  The liveliness of the class during these sessions will largely depend on the extent to which students engage the material and take ownership for the discussion in class.

 

 

WORK EXPECTATIONS:

Pages 9 to 17 of this syllabus contain a detailed course schedule, with reading assignments and study/discussion questions for each of our meeting times this semester.

 

For each class session, it is expected that:

 

(1)   Students will be prepared.  For a theory session, this means having read the assigned chapter and being familiar with the concepts and tools contained therein.

For a case-study session, it means having read and analyzed the case, and coming to class with a set of personal notes containing your best thinking.  Study questions are provided to highlight key issues and to guide your analysis.

If students are unprepared for class, written assignments based on chapters or cases will be assigned on the spot.


(2)   Student will be active participants.  During theory sessions this means answering questions presented by the professor, asking your own questions, and volunteering experiences or insights related to the topic.  You may also be called upon to talk about an issue. 

During case sessions, it means contributing your own ideas as well as building upon, or disagreeing with, ideas expressed and positions taken by others.  You may also be called upon to present your analysis or to lead a discussion.

 

Realize that you cannot be an active participant unless you are fully prepared for class.  Given this, here is my estimate of what it will take for you to be successful in this course:

(1)   Assigned chapters are about 30 pages each.  Accordingly, you should plan on about 2 hours of reading and writing notes to prepare for a theory session.

 

(2)   Assigned cases are also about 20 pages each.  However, preparing a case is a bit more involved and it will require a minimum of 6 hours distributed as follows:

(i)                  A first read of the case, highlighting important information and making notes on the margins.  The objective here is to learn about the case’s facts and to identify those that are most relevant.   (2 hours).

(ii)                Review of assigned discussion questions (to be found in pages 9 to 17 of this syllabus) followed by a focused second read of the case (mostly you go over your prior marks and notes).  The objective now is to gain further familiarity with issues pertinent to the required analysis.   (1 hour).

(iii)               Your critical analysis.  Typically, you will be asked to identify and characterize the roots of problems, which will call for you to apply tools, concepts, and models introduced in the preceding theory session(s).  Often, you will also be asked to propose appropriate solutions as well.  Use your best thinking and try to come up with practical recommendations that make good business sense.   (2 hours, minimum).

(iv)              Producing a minimum set of notes containing your analysis and final conclusions.  (1 hour).

 

You should bring your case notes to class with you, to support your arguments during our discussion.   To the extent possible I also recommend that you meet in small, informal groups to further discuss cases before class.  Experience shows that students in large class groups tend to participate more when they have adopted a position before walking into class, and when they have some smaller group that they identify with.  Create a study group that meets after everyone has become familiar with the case’s facts/issues*.  This will provide an opportunity for you to present your preliminary analysis and positions and have others react to them.  This is also an opportunity to learn about aspects of the problem you may have missed, as well as to encounter different approaches and points of view regarding the most appropriate solution.  The small group context allows you to learn about and argue different positions in a relaxed, exchange-intensive setting.  The point is not to reach an agreement (although it is OK if this happens), but to practice conveying your ideas, and to begin refining and enriching your thinking!

 

In sum, you should plan on investing a minimum of 8 hours per topic to prepare for class (work loads are lighter for the first 5 weeks and heavier afterwards).

 

 

EVALUATION:

Class Participation and Write-ups:      25%

Examinations:                                     75%

Midterm:                      35%

Final:                            40%

 

 

GRADING SCALE:

Final course (letter) grades will be assigned using the new plus/minus grading system adopted by the University.  Also, numerical grades for all course components will be expressed in a 4.0 scale.  The equivalence between numerical and letter grades will roughly follow the same scale used by the University to award academic honor points.  Specifically, the grading scale for this course will be as follows:

 

                                    3.6 – 4.0   =  A

                                    3.4 – 3.5   =  A-

                                    3.1 – 3.3   =  B+

                                    2.7 – 3.0   =  B

                                    2.4 – 2.6   =  B-

                                    2.1 – 2.3   =  C+

                                    1.7 – 2.0   =  C

1.4 – 1.6   =  C-

1.1 – 1.3   =  D+

0.7 – 1.0   =  D

                                    0.0 – 0.6   =  F

 

 

PARTICIPATION:

Participation in class discussions is instrumental to one of the four learning objectives of the course.  Also, the active participation format of the class provides incentives for you to be prepared for each and every class.  Steady work over the length of the semester will prove the most important factor in your ultimate degree of success in the course.  Correspondingly, participation is an important component of your overall course grade.  You should be ready and try to participate every single class.

 

Participation points are awarded each session.  I will jot down participation during the class session itself, with the help of a seating chart.  I will also review my record right after each class, while memory is still fresh, and make any necessary corrections.  I am counting on your help as well to make sure that I keep an accurate record.  You are invited to check the participation record with me after every class; and are encouraged to do so if ever you suspect that your contribution may have been overlooked by mistake.

 

Credit for participation will be earned as follows:

(-1) Unprepared student.  Students are expected to be prepared for class.  This is an absolute requirement, not a source of credit.  If called upon and found unprepared, a point will be subtracted from your participation record. 

        Also, students’ personal case analysis notes (to be prepared and brought to the case discussion session) may be collected for the professor’s review at any time; or short exercises be assigned in class at the professor’s discretion.  Evaluation of these will also be reflected in the form of preparedness points (i.e., 0 or –1).

If, for some unexpected reason, you could not prepare for a one class, you should approach me at the beginning of the session and let me know about it.  I will excuse you of participation for that day and make sure not to call upon you.  I will also exempt you from any preparedness check that might take place that particular day.

 

(0)    No guts no glory.  You receive no points unless you contribute.

 

(1) Contributor.  When you contribute your thinking (either voluntarily or prompted by the professor), or pose interesting questions, you get one point for the session.

      To encourage broad participation, students don’t receive multiple points for multiple contributions during a single session.  You can only gain one point per session.

 

REMEMBER:  You don’t need to be “right” to get participation points.  First of all there is typically more than one reasonable alternative solution to managerial problems, so that the very idea of a “right” solution is often an oxymoron in the context of this course.  Second, a bold idea, or a somewhat faulty argument, often make most valuable contributions to our discussion:  The former may open a new line of thought and argument, while the latter gives us something to work with and may trigger a clarifying an enriching debate.  So, just come to class prepared and share your best thinking with us!

 

Your final participation score at the end of the semester will be the sum of your participation points in all sessions.  A student must be prepared and be an active and persistent contributor to get a good participation grade.  We will meet for a total of 27 class sessions this term (not counting today’s).  The opportunity to contribute is unequal, depending on the session (theory versus case).  Given the size of our group, I will consider a score above 16 to represent outstanding participation.  Thus, I envision the correspondence between participation points and letter grades as follows:

 

Participation

Points

Numerical

Grade

Letter Grade Correspondence

0

0.0

F

1

1.0

D

2

1.6

C-

3

2.0

C

4

2.3

C+

5

2.5

B-

6

2.6

B-

7

2.7

B

8

2.8

B

9

2.9

B

10

3.0

B

11

3.1

B+

12

3.2

B+

13

3.3

B+

14

3.4

A-

15

3.5

A-

16

3.6

A

17

3.7

A

18

3.8

A

19

3.9

A

20 or above

4.0

A

 

 

WRITE-UPS:

            There is a required write-up for the “Cadbury-Schweppes” case, which is due on Tuesday, October 25.  See page 12 of this syllabus for details.  Furthermore, there will be an opportunity to turn-in three additional case write-ups for extra-credit.  Materials subject to this opportunity are extension cases (i.e., not part of the required materials for the course) and write-ups are optional.  For each case, discussion questions are provided which constitute your assignment.  For details see the detailed course schedule [pages 10 (week 4), 14 (week 11), and 16 (week 15)].

 

Write-ups will receive 0, 1, or 2 points.  To receive credit, write-ups must tackle and complete the required analysis.  Therefore, please make sure that you understand the assignment and that you fully execute the task(s) at hand.  Beyond that, submissions will receive either 1 or 2 points depending on “quality”.  The latter means the depth and precision of the analysis, and the judiciousness of conclusions and recommendations.

 

The lion’s share of your time should be spent going over case information and thinking about and analyzing the issues assigned.  When you finally reach your conclusions, you should simply report on your analysis and recommendations in a direct, brief, and persuasive manner (e.g., use bullet points!).

 

Your report should be written as if you were a consultant working for management.  Several implications follow:  First, you should refrain from wasteful repetition of the case’s framing and/or unnecessary case facts.  Your reader is very familiar with the firm and its industry (i.e., very familiar with the case).  Second, your reader is very busy and won’t have the time to read a very lengthy document.  Therefore, try not to be verbose, and think about the most effective way to present your ideas (may be a table?).  Finally, your reader is most interested in the bottom line of your arguments, conclusions, and final position statements (i.e., your analysis and advice on the issues brought to your attention).  Therefore, do not write about anything that is not directly pertinent to answering the assigned question(s).  In sum, your report should be focused, and your writing-style should be succinct and to the point.

 

Write-ups should be typed, using 1 inch margins and size 12 fontThere should be a cover page with the case title and student name on it.  After that, assigned discussion questions should be addressed, one at a time, and in the assigned order.  Number and repeat each discussion question (as it appears in your syllabus) at the top of a new page, and submit your best arguments after that.  Format is important and it also affects your grade.

 

 

EXAMINATIONS:

There will be two in-class examinations during the semester (a mid-term and a final).  Test dates are provided in the course schedule (pages 9 to 17).

 

 

 

COURSE POLICIES

 

LATE ASSIGNMENTS:

            Assignments may be turned in prior to the due date for full credit.  Late work without prior arrangements due to special circumstances will receive no credit.

 

 

MISSED TESTS:

            It is your responsibility to be in class at the assigned date and time for each exam (unless arrangements were made in advance for an alternative time –see Test Make-up Policy bellow).  In order to adhere to standards of professionalism and academic rigor, as well as out of fairness to students that meet course requirements, there will no make-up tests for missed exams.

The only exception to this policy might be under the rare circumstance of a last minute emergency (i.e., accident, sudden illness, etc.) –see unplanned absences bellow.

 

 

TEST MAKE-UP:

Since tests are scheduled during regular class periods or during the exam week, there should be no time conflicts with other classes.  Hence, make-up tests will be arranged only under extenuating circumstances that justify your absence.  There are two types of justified exam absences:

·          Planned absences:  If you do have an unavoidable time conflict (e.g., job interview trip, intercollegiate sports team travel), speak to me well in advance of the scheduled test date to make arrangements for an alternate time.  There will be no make-up tests provided, due to planned absences, unless arrangements are made with me at least a week in advance of the test date.  Also, no makeup test will be permitted more than one week after the regularly scheduled test date.

·          Unplanned absences:  If an unplanned circumstance (i.e., illness or medical emergency) were to occur that makes you unable to attend an exam, you (or someone on your behalf) must get in touch with me as soon as possible, via phone or e-mail (indicating a phone number where you or the contact person can be reached).  You will also need to provide a doctor’s note or other proper verification of the confining emergencyMake-up tests will be provided only if and when your inability to physically attend the scheduled exam has been established.


 

 

OTHER UNIVERSITY and COLLEGE POLICIES

 

The following University and/or College policies apply to all students in this course:

 

ACADEMIC HONESTY:

            Academic honesty and integrity are upheld as fundamental principles of scholarly conduct and are, thus, expected of students and faculty in all of their work.  Accordingly, cheating and plagiarism will be handled as severe infractions of the University’s ethical standards.

            Cheating means to misrepresent the source, nature, or other conditions of your academic work (e.g., tests, papers, projects, assignments) so as to get undeserved credit.  The use of the intellectual property of others without giving them appropriate credit is a serious academic offense.  It is the University policy that cheating or plagiarism result in receiving a failing grade (0 points) for the work or course.  Repeat offenses may result in dismissal from the University.

 

 

ENROLLMENT / OFFICIAL REGISTRATION:

Students have the responsibility to ensure they are properly enrolled in classes.  You are advised to review your official class schedule (using Web for Students) during the first two weeks of the semester to ensure you are properly enrolled in this class section.  Should you find an error in your class schedule, you have until Friday, September 9, to correct the error with your advising office.  If registration errors are not corrected by this date and you continue to attend and participate in classes for which you are not officially enrolled, you are advised now that you will not receive a grade at the conclusion of the semester for any class in which you are not properly registered.

 

 

COURSE WITHDRAWAL:

For Fall 2005, the course withdrawal deadline is Sunday, November 6, 2005.

 

 

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES:

University policy 3342-3-18 requires that students with disabilities be provided reasonable accommodations to ensure their equal access to course content.  If you have a documented disability and require accommodations, please contact the instructor at the beginning of the semester to make arrangements for necessary classroom adjustments.  Please note, you must first verify your eligibility for these through Student Disability Services (contact 330-672-3391 or visit http://www.registrars.kent.edu/disability/  for more information on registration procedures).

 


 

M&IS 44285

Dr. Jaume Franquesa

Fall '05

COURSE SCHEDULE

 

 

WEEK 1:

 

 

 

 

Read:  Course syllabus.

           Chapter 1, Hitt et al. (2005)

 

 

Aug. 30

 

BriefingCourse Presentation and overview

 

Lecture: Introduction to Strategic Management

 

 

 

Sep. 1

 

 

Strategic Management:  Key Concepts and Theories

Study Questions:   1.— What are strategic competitiveness, competitive advantage, and above-average returns?

2.— According to the I/O model, what should a firm do to earn above average returns?

3.— According to the resource-based model, what should a firm do to earn above average returns?

4.— What are the parts of the strategic management process?  How are these parts interrelated?

 

WEEK 2:

 

 

 

 

Read:  Chapter 2, Hitt et al. (2005).

            “Note on the structural analysis of industries”, Porter, HBSP.

 

 

Sep. 6

 

 

External Environment Analysis

Study Questions:   1.— Why is it important for firms to understand the external environment?

2.— What are the differences between the general environment and the industry environment?

3.— What is an industry? How does each of Porter's five forces impact profitability of an industry?

 

 

 

Sep. 8

 

 

Porter’s Five Forces Model

Study Questions:   1.— Provide a definition for each of the “drivers” under “Threat of Entry”?  How is each driver impacting “Threat of Entry”?  Can you come up with examples?

2.— Ditto for “Threat of Substitutes”.

3.— Ditto for “Rivalry”.

 

WEEK 3:

 

 

 

 

 

Analyze: "The Boeing Company" case.

 

 

Sep. 13

 

 

Porter’s Five Forces Model (cont.)

Study Questions:   1.— What is the difference between barriers to entry and barriers to exit?

2.— Provide a definition for each of the “drivers” under “Bargaining Power of Suppliers”?  How is each driver impacting “Power of Suppliers”?

3.— Ditto for “Power of Buyers”.

 

 

 

Sep. 15

 

 

"The Boeing Company" case

Discussion Question:   Is the commercial jet aircraft manufacturing industry attractive in 1995? 

(Hint:  Perform an analysis of substitutes, barriers to entry, bargaining power of buyers, and rivalry.  For each force, assess the strength of its component “drivers” and then reach a conclusion about the overall strength and key determinants of that force.   Finally, combine your conclusions on the four forces analyzed to reach an overall judgment of the attractiveness of the industry)

 

WEEK 4:

 

 

Read:  Chapter 3, Hitt et al. (2005).

 

** Optional Assignment:  “Crown, Cork, & Seal” case.

Discussion Question:  1.— Use the information contained in the case to perform a 5-forces analysis of the metal container industry in 1990

 

 

Sep. 20

 

"The Boeing Company" case (cont.)

Discussion Questions:   What changes are taking place in the industry?  What is the industry outlook?  Will the industry be more or less attractive in the future?

 

 

 

Sep. 22

 

 

Internal Environment Analysis

Study Questions:   1.— What are the differences between tangible and intangible resources?

2.— What are capabilities?  How are they developed?

3.— What are the four criteria used to determine which of a firm's resources and capabilities are its core competencies?

4.— What knowledge can be gained by using the value chain analysis?

5.— What are the potential benefits and potential risks of outsourcing?

6.— What mechanisms make core competencies costly to imitate?

 

 

Sep. 23

(Friday)

** Optional Assignment due: “Crown, Cork, & Seal” case.  Write-up is due in my mailbox by 5:00 p.m., Friday, Sep. 23.

 

WEEK 5;

 

 

Analyze:  "Saturn: A Different Kind of Car Company" case.

 

 

Sep. 27

 

"Saturn: A Different Kind of Car Company" case

Discussion Questions:   1.— Is Saturn a successful company in 1994?  Does it seem that Saturn have a competitive advantage?

2.— What activities support Saturn’s strategy for creating value?

[Hint: Use the value chain framework to list activities that are both valuable and rare.  Focus your analysis on Operations (Mftg), Mktg & Sales, and HRM].

 

 

 

Sep. 29

 

 

"Saturn: A Different Kind of Car Company" case (cont.)

Discussion Question:   3.— Can these activities be easily duplicated? How sustainable is Saturn’s positioning in the small car segment?

4.— How can Saturn’s experience and knowledge be transferred throughout GM?

 

WEEK 6;

 

 

 

Read:  Chapter 4, Hitt et al. (2005)

 

 

Oct. 4

 

Business-Level Strategy.

Study Questions:   1.— What is a proper definition of strategy and what are business-level strategies?

2.— How is competitive advantage achieved under each of Porter’s generic business strategies?

 

 

 

Oct. 6

 

 

Business-Level Strategy (cont.)

Study Question:   3.— What are the requirements and risks associated with implementing each generic strategy?

 

WEEK 7:

 

 

Analyze:  "Adolph Coors in the Brewing Industry" case.

 

 

Oct. 11

 

 

"Adolph Coors in the Brewing Industry" case

Discussion Questions:   1.— Coors was very successful through the mid-1970s.  What was its strategy up to that point: How was Coors value chain configured historically? What type of generic competitive advantage did such a value chain confer?

2.— How did Coors’ operating performance change relative to its competitors’ in the period between 1977 and 1985?

[Hint: Use Exhibit-9 in the case to produce a table with the entire operating statements of Coors and its key competitors for the years 1977 and 1985 in $ per barrel (so that statements are comparable across firms).  Figures for 1985 should be expressed in $’s of 1977 (to be able to compare across time as well)].

 

 

 

Oct. 13

 

"Adolph Coors in the Brewing Industry" case (cont.)

Discussion Question:   3.— What are the reasons behind changes in Coors’ performance?  Are these changes dictated by changes in the industry environment, or are they rather the result of Coors own decisions/actions?

 

Briefing:  Module Q&A and Exam information.

 

WEEK 8:

 

 

Midterm Examination

 

Read :  Chapter 5, Hitt et al. (2005)

 

 

 

Oct. 18:

 

 

 

MIDTERM  EXAMINATION

 

 

 

Oct 20:

 

 

Competitive Dynamics

Study Questions:  1.— What is competitive dynamics and why is it important to consider it?

2.— What factors explain the likelihood of a response to a competitive action?

3.— What are the advantages and disadvantages of being a first, second, or late mover?

4.— How does interfirm rivalry differ in slow-, standard-, and fast-cycle markets?

 

Briefing:  Midterm  Exam  Feedback.

 

WEEK 9:

 

 

 

 

Analyze:  “Cadbury Schweppes PLC and Dr Pepper/7UP Corporation" case.

 

 

Oct. 25

 

NO LECTURE:  (Annual Meeting of the Strategic Management Society)

 

** REQUIRED Assignment due: “Cadbury Schweppes PLC and Dr Pepper/7UP Corporation” case write-up is due in my mailbox by 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, Oct. 25.

 

 

 

Oct. 27

 

                “Cadbury Schweppes PLC and Dr Pepper/7UP Corporation" case

Discussion Questions:   1.— How is the merger benefiting Cadbury Schweppes?  How is it benefiting Dr Pepper/7UP?   Is this a sensible strategic action for both companies?

2.— Will Coke & Pepsi be concerned about this merger?  Is there reason to expect a competitive reaction from them?

3.— After the merger, how would Cadbury Schweppes be positioned to compete in the American market?  What would be their strengths and weaknesses?  If Coke & Pepsi would want to respond to this strategic action, what would their likely reaction(s) be?

4.— Considering your analysis in the prior question, should Cadbury Schweppes still go ahead with this deal?

 

WEEK 10:

 

 

Read:  Chapter 6, Hitt et al. (2005).

 

Analyze:  “Eastman Kodak Co.” case.

 

 

Nov. 1

 

 

Corporate-Level Strategy.

Study Questions:  1.— What is corporate-level strategy?  How is it different from business-level strategy?

2.— What is the difference between single, dominant-business, related-constrained, related-linked, and unrelated-diversified firms?

3.— How can the corporation create value over and above the value of its component businesses?  What does corporate value mean?  What is the ultimate test of a good corporate strategy?

4.— How do related diversified firms create corporate value?

5.— How is transferring core competencies different from sharing activities?

 

 

 

Nov. 3

 

Corporate-Level Strategy (cont.)

Study Questions:   6.— Do unrelated diversified firms create corporate value?  How?

7.—  What do we mean by external and internal motives to diversify?

 

Eastman Kodak Co.” case

Discussion Questions:  1.— Was Kodak a diversified corporation in the mid-1980s?  What businesses had the firm entered at that point? Where these related or unrelated?

2.— How did Mr. Chandler modify the corporate portfolio of businesses?  What were the results of his corporate strategy?

3.— How did Mr. Whitmore modify the corporate strategy?  How would you evaluate his performance as CEO?

 

WEEK 11:

 

 

Read:  Chapter 7, Hitt et al. (2005).

“Mergers: Why most big deals don’t pay off,” Henry, D., BusinessWeek, October 14, 2002, pp. 60-70.

 

** Optional Assignment:  “Newell Company: Corporate Strategy” case.

Discussion Questions:  1.— What is Newell’s intended corporate strategy?  What are all the ways in which Newell attempts to add value to the businesses within its portfolio? 

2.— Does Newell have a successful corporate-level strategy?  (i.e, is Newell adding value to businesses over and above the costs of corporate overhead?)  How was Newell’s performance through 1997?

3.— Does the Calphalon acquisition make sense?  Can Newell successfully service up-scale department store customers? Why or why not? 

 

 

 

Nov. 8

 

Eastman Kodak Co.” case (cont.)

Discussion Questions:  4.— Does Fisher's downscoping strategy make sense, given Kodak's recent history?  What were its short-term results?

5.— What should be Kodak's corporate strategy after the divestments?  Where should growth come from?  Is it appropriate for Kodak to invest in digital technology or should the firm be managed as a mature cash-cow?

 

 

 

Nov. 10

 

Acquisition and Restructuring Strategies.

Study Questions:   1.— What are the alternatives for changing the portfolio of businesses of a diversified firm?

2.— For what reasons might related-diversified firms follow an acquisition strategy?

3.— What problems might be encountered by firms following an acquisition strategy?

4.— What do we mean by restructuring? What are the pros and cons of leveraged buyouts?

 

 

 

Nov. 11

(Friday)

 

** Optional Assignment due: “Newell Company: Corporate Strategy”.  Write-up is due in my mailbox by 5:00 p.m., Friday, Nov. 11

 

WEEK 12:

 

 

Read:  Chapter 10, Hitt et al. (2005).

 

 

Nov. 15

 

Corporate Governance

Study Questions:  1.— What is corporate governance?

2.— What is an agency relationship?  What assumptions does agency theory make about managerial agents?   What are the alternative solutions to agency problems?

3.— What mechanisms are available to monitor top management in the context of the public corporation?

4.— What new developments in board governance resulted from the wave of corporate scandals in 2001-02 in the U.S.?

 

 

 

Nov. 17

 

Corporate Governance (cont.)

Study Questions:  5.— How can incentive compensation be used to align the interests of managerial agents with those of the firm's owners?

6.— What is the market for corporate control?  How does this mechanism align top-level managers' and shareholders’ interests?

 

WEEK 13:

 

 

Analyze:  “Sears, Roebuck & Co.” case.

 

 

Nov. 22

 

“Sears, Roebuck & Co.” case.

Discussion Questions:   1.— What was Sears situation during the second half of the 1980’s?  Was Ed Brennan’s “new strategy” appropriate?

2.— What was the role of the board of directors at Sears?  Was their role appropriate?

3.— What other governance mechanisms were present in this case? How well were these mechanisms aligning the interests of managers and owners?

4.— Did any benefits result from Robert Monks’ proxy contest in 1991?

 

 

 

Nov. 24

 

NO CLASS  (Thanksgiving  Recess)

 

WEEK 14:

 

 

Read:  Chapter 11, Hitt et al. (2005), pp. 338-347.

 

Analyze:  Appex Corp.” case.

 

 

Nov. 29

 

Organizational Structure and Controls

Study Questions:  1.— What are the purposes of organization structure?  What is the difference between coordination and control?

2.— What are the basic types of organization structures, and what are their main characteristics?

3.— What are hybrid forms?  What is a matrix organization?

 

 

 

Dec. 1

 

Appex Corp.” case

Discussion Questions:  1.— What are Appex problems when Shikhar Ghosh takes the COO job? Do you agree with his early assessment that the company needed more “structure and control”?

2.— What was accomplished with the change to the circular structure?  Did this resolve any of the original problems?  What new problems resulted from this organizational solution?

3.— What was accomplished with the move to the functional structure in 1989?  What new problems resulted from this structure? What changes were made, initially, to deal with these problems? Were changes effective? Why or why not?

 

WEEK 15:

 

 

Read:  Chapter 11, Hitt et al. (2005), pp. 348-358.

            Chapter 12, Hitt et al. (2005), pp. 394-397.

 

** Optional Assignment:  “SITEL Corp.” case.

Discussion Questions:  1.— What are the benefits of SITEL’s current decentralized structure?

2.— What would be the benefits of a centralized divisional structure as envisioned by May and Clough?

3.— What type of benefit do you expect will be more valuable in this industry in the near future?  Why?

4.— What should they do?  What changes in structure do you recommend?

 

 

 

Dec. 6

 

 

Appex Corp.” case (cont.)

Discussion Questions:  4.— What benefits resulted from the company’s transition to a divisional structure in 1990? What new problems emerged?

5.— What further structural changes would you recommend?

6.— What do you think of Mr. Ghosh’s approach to organizational change?  Where all the organizational changes necessary?  Would you have done anything differently as CEO of Appex Corp. between 1988 and 1990?

 

 

 

Dec. 8

 

 

Strategy-Structure Fit

Study Questions:  1.— What organizational structure characteristics are consistent with a cost-leadership strategy?  What type of an organizational structure will support implementation of a differentiation strategy?

2.— What organizational structures are used to implement the related-constrained, related-linked, and unrelated diversification strategies?

3.— What are the main precepts and findings of the so-called “differentiated-fit” school of strategy implementation?

 

Briefing 1:  Module Q&A and Exam information.

 

Briefing 2:  Course closure and professor evaluations

 

 

 

Dec. 9

(Friday)

 

 

** Optional Assignment due: “SITEL Corp.” case.  Write-up is due in my mailbox by 5:00 p.m., Friday, Dec. 9

 

 

WEEK 16:

 

 

 

FINAL  EXAMINATION  (Wednesday, Dec. 14, at 12:45 p.m.)

 

 

 

 



* I would like to keep track of active study groups.  Please, let me know about your group, if you should form one.

Document Actions